-
Policy Critique: Ueda et al. On Japan’s COVID-19 Vaccine Public Health Response
Editorial This issue features the third entry in a growing category of peer-reviewed scholarship in Science, Public Health Policy & the…
-
The Limits to Public Opinion and the Failure of Democracy
The watchword among progressives this election season is: “Nothing less than our…
-
Oh No! The NYT is distraught over the government’s shrinking lexicon.
accessible activism activists advocacy advocate advocates affirming care all-inclusive allyship anti-racism antiracist…
-
Understanding the Action Axiom: How It Shapes the Structure of Society
Central to the paradigm of Austrian Economics is the Action Axiom. People…
Editor’s Choice
About the Journal
This initiative exists to help insure that policies in public health practice and law are founded on a full consideration of available knowledge derived by robust science. From Dr Lyons-Weiler: “While IPAK will continue to conduct basic, clinical and translational biomedical research in a completely unbiased manner, and will pubish results regardless of the outcome, it will also be increasingly centered on questions of policy and law that impact public health, laws that impact public health, and cases and rulings that impact the citizen’s expression of self-governance through law. We’re putting the Public back into Public Health.”